Analisis Hukum tentang Tanggung Jawab dokter dalam Kasus Malpraktik Medis di Indonesia

Authors

  • Gina Musfirah Fakultas Hukum dan Ekonomi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Nusa Tengggara Barat, 84116, Indonesia
  • Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Fakultas Hukum dan Ekonomi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Nusa Tengggara Barat, 84116, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63868/jihk.v2i01.51

Keywords:

Medical Malpractice; Legal Liability; Patient Protection; Health Law.

Abstract

The relationship between a doctor and a patient is a therapeutic one based on trust and maximum effort (inspanningsverbintenis), not on a guaranteed outcome (resultaatsverbintenis). In practice, disputes often arise due to alleged medical negligence that harms patients, commonly known as malpractice. Given that medical malpractice is a widely researched topic, this study provides novelty by explicitly focusing its analysis on the shift toward a restorative justice paradigm as mandated by Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. This study aims to analyze the forms of legal liability of doctors in medical malpractice cases in Indonesia from the perspectives of civil, criminal, and administrative law. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and jurisprudential approaches. The results indicate that doctors' liabilities encompass material and immaterial compensation (civil), license revocation sanctions (administrative), and imprisonment as a last resort (ultimum remedium) if gross negligence is proven. Crucially, the proof of malpractice must be clearly distinguished from unavoidable medical risks that occur despite adherence to professional standards.

References

Nasution BJ. Hukum Kesehatan: Pertanggungjawaban Dokter. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta; 2005.

Fiscina S, et al. Medical Liability. St. Paul: West Publishing Co; 1991.

Guwandi J. Dugaan Malpraktik Medik & Perjanjian Terapeutik Antara Dokter Dengan Pasien. Jakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2004.

Susila ME. Malpraktik Medik dan Pertanggungjawaban Hukumnya: Analisis dan Evaluasi Konseptual. Law and Justice. 2021;6(1):46-61.

World Health Organization. Patient Safety: Global Action on Patient Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

Mello MM, Frakes MD, Blumenkranz E, Seabury SA. Malpractice Liability and Health Care Quality: A Review. JAMA. 2020;323(4):352-366.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2023, No. 105. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara; 2023.

Braithwaite J. Restorative justice in healthcare: A systemic approach to medical errors. Social Science & Medicine. 2022;295:114722.

Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2017.

Hutchinson T. Doctrinal research: Researching the jury. In: Watkins D, Burton M, editors. Research Methods in Law. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 8-29.

Pontoh MR. Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Resiko Medik dan Malpraktek dalam Pelaksanan Tugas Dokter. Lex Crimen. 2013;2(7):10-25.

Riza RA. Tanggung Jawab Dokter Terhadap Pasien Dalam Hal Terjadinya Malpraktik Medik Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum. 2018;4(1):1-15.

Saputra RP. Aspek Hukum Administrasi Dalam Kesehatan (Administratif Malpraktik). Bangkinang: Universitas Pahlawan; 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Musfirah, G., & Syamsuddin, S. (2026). Analisis Hukum tentang Tanggung Jawab dokter dalam Kasus Malpraktik Medis di Indonesia. Juris Prima: Jurnal Inovasi Hukum Dan Kebijakan, 2(01), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.63868/jihk.v2i01.51

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.